In last week's post—read it before you read this one—I presented evidence of deep math concept deficits in four 5th graders in inner-city Brooklyn. Math is America's weakest subject, according to the results of international exams,[1] and it's traditionally the most feared and hated among students. There's a lot of debate as to why that is, and as with so many other issues, that debate tends to polarize around two camps. For years, I have found myself torn between those camps, but I believe the evidence that I presented last week offers a glimpse of an elusive middle-ground and a more nuanced approach to math education.
MAX BEAN on education: pedagogy, curriculum, schooling, and education reform in America, from private to public to charter, from Romantic to Progressive to No-Excuses
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
The Confusion Beneath Confusion:
Brief Glimpses of Number and Quantity
For the past few months, I’ve been spending a couple hours each week teaching remedial math to four fifth-graders in inner-city Brooklyn. My assignment: help my students to develop a conceptual grasp of numbers and elementary mathematics.
Over the course of my first week or two with my charges, I gauged my students’ knowledge and understanding—or so I thought. In fact, I had discerned only the superficial: their addition tables were shaky, but they could perform two-digit column-addition; they could carry but were prone to mistakes; three of them could borrow, but again with errors; they could name the place values of two- and in some cases three-digit numbers; they could quickly add multiples of ten in their heads.
It took me several weeks to realize what should have been obvious: that that was a procedural assessment, not a conceptual one. Beneath those weak basic skills were fundamental gaps in my students’ understanding of number and quantity.
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Finland (Part 2)
Last week, I posted an article about the demographic causes of Finland’s preeminence on the 2009 Programme for International Student Assessments (PISA) exams. My purpose in that post was to show that a simple comparison between countries is impossible—but this is not to say that we can learn nothing from international comparisons. We can learn a lot, but only through careful and detailed examination of the data. I’ve spent much of the past two weeks sifting through that data, and I’ve come up with some interesting leads.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)